비에이의원

The Complete Guide to Fat Dissolving Injections

— Analyzing the Biochemical Mechanism of Selective Adipocyte Death and Comparing Steroid-Based vs. Fat Extraction Injections

"I dieted and exercised, but why won't this area budge?" — This question is a common concern for many struggling with localized fat. While diet and exercise can affect overall body weight, they don't eliminate fat cells in specific areas; they merely reduce their size. This article will delve into the biochemical principles behind fat dissolving injections, the differences between steroid-based and non-steroid treatments, and the indications for fat extraction injections, all based on medical evidence.

---

1. Why Localized Fat Resists Diet and Exercise — Adipocyte Biology

Adipose tissue is composed of adipocytes, and the number of adipocytes in adults remains relatively constant after puberty. Weight loss doesn't decrease the number of fat cells but rather reduces the amount of triglyceride stored within them. This means existing fat cells remain and can expand again when there's an energy surplus.

More importantly, fat distribution exhibits regional specificity. Certain areas like the jawline, lower abdomen, inner thighs, and outer arms have a lower response to sympathetic nervous system stimulation, making fat breakdown (lipolysis) less efficient. This is due to a lower density of β-adrenergic receptors and a higher density of α2 receptors in the adipocytes of these regions. The α2 receptor, when activated by norepinephrine, actually inhibits lipolysis.

Consequently, fat in these physiologically resistant areas is difficult to address with systemic fat reduction strategies alone. This is where localized fat reduction treatments gain clinical significance.

---

2. Classification of Fat Dissolving Injection Mechanisms — Steroid-Based vs. Non-Steroid

Fat dissolving injections can be broadly categorized into combinations containing steroids and combinations that directly destroy or dissolve fat cells without steroids.

① Steroid-Based Fat Dissolving Injections

Steroids (primarily triamcinolone acetonide) possess potent anti-inflammatory effects and also inhibit glucose uptake by adipocytes while increasing the activity of lipolytic enzymes, leading to adipocyte atrophy. While the short-term effects are noticeable, repeated administration can cause side effects such as skin atrophy, hypopigmentation, and telangiectasia. Systemic effects must also be considered in patients with diabetes or hypertension.

② Non-Steroid Fat Dissolving Injections (Zero Fat Mega Dose / Body Fit)

Developed to avoid the side effects of steroid-based treatments, the main ingredients include:

• Phosphatidylcholine (PPC) — Activates phospholipases that break down cell membrane phospholipids, directly destroying adipocyte membranes and inducing apoptosis and necrosis. In 2015, the FDA approved deoxycholic acid (Kybella® / ATX-101) for submental fat reduction, which shares a similar surfactant mechanism with PPC.
• Deoxycholic acid (DC) — A bile acid derivative that acts as a surfactant, physically disrupting the lipid bilayer of cell membranes. Its selectivity for adipocytes is enhanced when combined with PPC.
• L-Carnitine — Promotes fatty acid oxidation within mitochondria, thereby activating energy metabolism. It acts by enhancing metabolism rather than cell destruction.
• Caffeine / Artichoke Extract — Inhibits phosphodiesterase (PDE), increasing intracellular cAMP concentration and indirectly activating lipolytic enzymes (hormone-sensitive lipase, HSL).

BA Clinic's Zero Fat Mega Dose injection is formulated with highly pure, steroid-free ingredients, allowing for safe treatment of larger areas or those requiring repeated sessions without steroid-related side effects. Body Fit injection is BA Clinic's proprietary combination targeting specific areas, aiming for effective fat cell breakdown with reduced pain.

---

3. Fat Dissolving Injections vs. Fat Extraction Injections — Indications and Outcome Differences

While both procedures aim to reduce fat, their mechanisms of action and suitable indications differ.

The key differences lie in the amount of fat and the speed of results. For small, dispersed localized fat, dissolving injections are more suitable. For faster results or when dealing with relatively larger fat volumes, fat extraction injections are more appropriate. Clinically, these procedures are sometimes combined sequentially.

---

4. Combined Device Therapies — The Role of Body InMode FX and Ulfit

Injection-based fat dissolving treatments may have limitations regarding skin elasticity changes or cellulite. To complement these, device-based procedures are often used.

Max Body InMode FX

Utilizes radiofrequency (RF) energy to deliver thermal energy to the dermis and subcutaneous fat layers. Heating within the 41-43°C range induces thermal apoptosis of adipocytes while simultaneously promoting the remodeling of dermal collagen fibers, thereby improving skin elasticity. The Max energy setting is designed to achieve greater effects with fewer sessions.

Ulfit

This device applies High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) technology to the body, selectively targeting the fat layer and deep dermis without affecting the skin surface. It offers a two-stage lifting effect with two types of cartridges and is specialized for cellulite improvement and body tightening. Combining it with injection-based treatments can create synergistic effects.

---

5. Summary of Evidence-Based Clinical Data

Key clinical evidence regarding fat dissolving injections includes:

• ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) REFINE-1 & 2 Clinical Trials (JAMA Dermatology, 2014) — In randomized controlled trials for submental fat, the ATX-101 2mg/cm² group showed a significant reduction in fat thickness and improved patient satisfaction compared to the placebo group (p<0.001). Side effects primarily included injection site swelling, bruising, and temporary sensory changes, most of which resolved spontaneously within 2-4 weeks.
• Systematic Review of Topical Phosphatidylcholine Injections (Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 2011) — A meta-analysis of seven prospective studies confirmed an average reduction of 1.4-2.3 cm in fat layer thickness in the PPC topical administration group, with only localized reactions observed and no systemic side effects.
• RF-Based Body Lifting (Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 2017) — A 12-week follow-up after RF device treatment reported an average reduction of 2.5 cm in waist circumference and significant improvement in skin elasticity measurements (Cutometer®).
• HIFU Body Treatment Efficacy (Dermatologic Surgery, 2019) — Application of HIFU to the abdomen and thighs resulted in an average 14.7% reduction in fat layer thickness and statistically significant improvement in skin elasticity.
  
  
  

---

6. Treatment Selection Strategy — Approach Based on Area, Fat Volume, and Body Type

For fat reduction treatments, designing the optimal combination based on the patient's condition is more important than relying on a single method. The following are general selection criteria.

The crucial point is not to try and solve everything with a single procedure, but rather to receive a customized plan after a comprehensive evaluation of the fat volume, skin thickness, elasticity, and anatomical characteristics of the area. Furthermore, basic dietary management and aerobic exercise after the procedure are key to preventing fat cell re-expansion and maintaining long-term results.

---